Supreme Court clarifies FAA exemption for certain intrastate delivery workers

Erin A. Webber President and Managing Director
Erin A. Webber President and Managing Director
0Comments

The United States Supreme Court clarified on May 29 the scope of the Federal Arbitration Act’s (FAA) transportation worker exemption, holding that some workers performing purely intrastate deliveries may still qualify for the exemption if they are part of a continuous interstate flow of goods.

In Flowers Foods, Inc. v. Brock, the Court determined that a worker does not need to cross state lines or directly interact with interstate transportation to be considered “engaged in interstate commerce” under the FAA. The decision expands potential coverage under the exemption but also provides a clearer framework for evaluating its application.

The FAA generally requires courts to enforce arbitration agreements, but Section 1 exempts contracts of employment for certain transportation workers engaged in interstate commerce. The Supreme Court’s recent decision emphasized interpreting this provision based on statutory text and historical meaning as understood when Congress enacted the statute.

At issue was whether local delivery workers—who deliver goods only after those goods have traveled across state lines—fall within this exemption. Lower courts had disagreed: some focused narrowly on whether a worker personally crossed state lines; others took a broader view considering whether their role was part of an ongoing interstate process. The Supreme Court resolved this split by holding that participation in any segment of an uninterrupted interstate journey qualifies a worker for the exemption.

The ruling means that last-mile delivery workers can be exempt from arbitration requirements if they handle goods moving in an unbroken stream across states and play a direct, active role in completing that movement. However, not all local delivery roles will automatically qualify—the determination depends on how closely connected duties are to an ongoing interstate flow of goods.

For employers, especially gig economy platforms and logistics companies, classification and structuring of roles become increasingly important as courts will examine supply chain structures and each worker’s involvement within them. While many arbitration agreements remain enforceable where roles are removed from interstate transport, early factual analysis is key to determining applicability.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related

Bridget C. Duignan, President of Illinois Bar Association

ISBA hosts 24th annual environmental and natural resources law conference in Chicago

The Illinois State Bar Association held its 24th annual Environmental and Natural Resources Law Conference at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. The event provided updates from major agencies as well as insights into emerging topics in environmental law.

Erin A. Webber President and Managing Director

Dutch House receives updated draft bill on EU pay transparency directive implementation

A revised draft bill implementing the EU Pay Transparency Directive has been submitted to the Dutch House of Representatives. Key changes address employer obligations around deadlines, treatment of non-binary employees in pay gap reports, and handling personal data under privacy laws.

Debra Franzese, Partner, Asset Management

Virtual course to address private equity co-investment structuring and SEC scrutiny

Debra Franzese and Larissa Marcellino are set to lead two virtual CLE webinars on private equity co-investments on June 3. Topics include deal origination, governance challenges, conflict management strategies, and SEC regulatory trends.

Trending

The Weekly Newsletter

Sign-up for the Weekly Newsletter from Prairie State Wire.